[en] The Prancing Pony > The Lord of the Rings

The Hobbit Trilogy

<< < (60/71) > >>

Spacetyrant93:
Well, tachnically speaking, the books aren't exactly comparable either, so it's even XD

I agree, the spirit changed, and probably people were less motivated, plus the rush and everything. I get that they could've gone other ways, make different choices and much more, but considering what they did, with what problems, deadlines and the rest, I really can't find it in me to blame them that much.
Whether they have 'flaws' or not I think it's mostly up to personal taste, for exemple many people didn't like Radagast, but I did, and really much .
I just enjoy both trilogies for what in my head is 'The Middle Earth Saga'.

ThorinsNemesis:
^Exactly what I think of the Hobbit trilogy as well  :).

I love the Hobbit movies and, no matter how strange it may sound, I actually find no flaws in it; that is my personal opinion, but I agree that with the circumstances PJ had, he really has made a great trilogy that is imo totally worthy and on level with Lotr.

LordDainIronfoot:
I feel quite the same! :-)

Although there are few things I quite disagree and don't approve so much,I too understand the situation PJ was left with the sudden leave of Del Toro and all he had to go trough! :-)

So for me the Movies were epic,perfect cast,perfect Visual from WETA on Armors,Costumes and etc.,perfect Music and Sounds by Shore and the Singers ,great Details and 3 Movies of Epic Middle Earth adventure is something that can never be bad in my eyes!I enjoyed the Hobbit Trilogy from the bottom of my heart,and it will remain as my favourite Movies alongside LOTR Trilogy! :-)

Greetings mates! :-)

Adamin:

--- Zitat von: DieWalküre am 20. Jan 2016, 17:09 ---and choosing strict creativity

--- Ende Zitat ---

Interesting. What exactly did you mean by that?

Walküre:

--- Zitat von: Adamin am 20. Jan 2016, 23:08 ---Interesting. What exactly did you mean by that?


--- Ende Zitat ---

Yes, maybe I used strict in a very cryptic way  xD

It's because I personally think that PJ managed to find a very well-thought equilibrium between his iconic interest in grotesque elements and the awareness that he was working on a trilogy (LOTR) about which the word solemn may be the most accurate adjective.

I mean, I believe that he intentionally chose to 'contain' his wildest and most disruptive fantasies (because he could have truly had the opportunity to unleash his creativity in the most bizarre ways, approaching to the events of LOTR), in a more conscious will of making a coherent and elegant outcome, mainly free from the exaggerations and disharmonious things that characterised the Hobbit trilogy.

Sometimes, elegance, coherence and perfection require less Quantity, in order to be of a higher Quality, and some boundaries are necessarily needed.
But, this is obviously an opinion of mine  :)

Navigation

[0] Themen-Index

[#] Nächste Seite

[*] Vorherige Sete