Hello ! In principle, meanwhile, you have done everything right! Now each siege / defensive unit will have its own distinct role
. Some of the members of the community correctly noted that, truly, now the siege of Gondor / Dwarfs or Angmar will not be an easy task and the defenders will not be doomed
. But I have two comments!
First: It's a mordor. With their fortress everything is fine, but what additional protective abilities / mechanisms for Dol Guldur and Minas Morgul you came up with ??? Because in principle these strongholds are simple barracks that allow you to hire troops. So why so much overpay 2500 against 500 barracks. Dale, the fortress of Dol Amroth and Thranduil fortress have the same role as the barracks, but they also have defense, medical and economic opportunities. I hope this shortcoming will also be corrected.
Second: It's Isengard. I really love playing for Isengard and I know how weak the passive defense of the fortress. Partially helps Saruman in Orthanc. If you are surrounded by catapults, you are almost doomed. But if you are attacked by the Ents, then this is your 100% loss, since the enty are vulnerable to fire, but the Isengard towers are bolted. (By the way, it seems to me that the analogous situation is with Angmar vs Ent) and Isengard has no defensive catapults. The new ability of Orthank from the spellbook promises us a slightly different system of renewal of the fortress (economy, intelligence and defense). And I'm wondering whether there will be any nebut new or recycled defense capabilities ???
. Forgive me for hurry because I wrote at work! Have a nice day!