That´s not what I´m asking for.
I want a seperate poll like this:
If the Iron Hills ballista gets implemented, what would you NOT like about it?
- chain ammo
- replacing katapult
- being added as additional unit
- being only a castle extension
multiple choices should be possible
Reason: There are people who would really like to have this ballista (like me), but only under certain conditions.
I´d rather not have it in the game then having it replacing the catapults and using this stupid chain ammo.
You know that DieWalkure and even Ea already warned everyone here not to use words like "stupid" right? Anyway, chain ammo will not be an option at all, whether we like it or not. The engine just doesn't support this.
And those choices don't need a seperate poll. Why not just one poll with things like this:
- Having both the Ballista and Catapult as siege weapons. (Same idea as your "don't want replacing Katapult" option)
- The Ballista will be the main siege weapon, and the Catapult will be removed. (Same idea as your " don't want being added as additional unit" option).
- The Ballista becoming only a Fortress Expansion.
- Having no Ballista at all and everything remains as it is.
- And this option I forgot to add: Having the catapult as fortress extension and using the Ballista as main siege weapon.
We don't need 2 seperate polls with the same meaning to it.
@KryptiK; mostly correct, for additional info you can look at the list I made here. Making them only good against monsters and having an ammo switch is something that could be added as additional information, but not as options in the poll.
Edit: I just read Crag's post and he made a nice suggestion, only using it as a summoning power for Drar. That one could also be added to the poll.